We recommend to use modern browsers like Chrome or Firefox
Check your WebGL support at webglreport.com
If the problem still persists contact with us and attach the following data:
Use orthographic camera projection
Use perspective camera projection
View the cloud from the right side
View the cloud from the top side
View the cloud from the front side
Use fly controls to navigate the point cloud
Use cursor keys and AWSD to move the camera
Use earth controls to navigate the point cloud
Drag a point and move the mouse
Use orbit controls to navigate the point cloud
The camera orbit around the center of the point cloud
Reset the camera to view the whole point cloud
Clip the point cloud using a bounding box volume
- E: translate the bounding box
- R: scale the bounding box
- T: rotate the bounding box
- C: switch clipping mode
Clip by a polygon
Clip by a screen box
Remove all clippings in the screen
Get the position of a point of the cloud
Measure angles between segments over points
Measure linear distances between points
Measure an area over the point cloud
Draw a profile line over the point cloud
- Press Ctrl key while drag the final point to change profile's width
Export all measurements in DXF file format
Rotate the point cloud along the Z axis
Remove all measures and profiles drawn over the point cloud
Caliber
Caliber
614.101 points
88 files
0 likes
194 views
Geobit_ONE
Your lat/lon coordinates are causing this linear pile. They are considered x/y so they have a small micrsons variation compared to elevation, that's why you see a single line. Convert your cloud into projected coordinates before uplads
Zach S
@Geobit_ONE I've spent maybe 2 weeks learning about 3D models for fun of my jobsite, so I apologize in advance for my ignorance! Yes coordinate is slightly off, and I've tried diff methods to try to correct to no avail. - It's my understanding that the reference setting is to stay WGS 84 - Import CSV file from mission, followed by converting to coordinate system - Using WGS 84 it appears above the map and "pile" above, if I change to Projected Coordinates and choose my area NAD83(2011) / Arkansas North (EPSG::6410) or I've tried or NAD83(HARN) / Arkansas North (ftUS) (EPSG::3441) it becomes higher in elevation off the basemap. Any advice would be appreciated! I'm using Agisoft Metashape- Thanks in advance